|
BACK TO ARCHIVE
*******************
Do you have a news item to contribute?
We want to hear from you! Members of the support group are welcome to
contribute any items of interest to the group at large. Updates on your status,
news about prostate cancer treatments, or anything you feel would be of interest
to the group are all welcome. Contact Doug Thornton, 588-1586 or
or Howard
Waage, 688-0423 with your story.
*******************
July
2006
NEWSLETTER
Howard Waage (688-0423) ----Editor
******************************
Where:
Our meeting will be
downstairs in two-story redwood Education Building behind Santa Cruz
Dominican Hospital. We meet in the Bennett & Suzy Katz Cancer Resource Center on
the 1st Floor.
When:
Tuesday, July 25th, 2006 7:00 PM For more information: Please call-The
Bennett and Suzy Katz
Cancer Resource Center at Dominican Hospital 831-462-7770
Please
feel free to contact any of the following steering committee members if you
would like to volunteer r if you have any suggestions or questions.
Tony
& Beverley Calvo 684-0940 Frank Schmetz 438 4781
Bill McDermott 423-8350 Howard Waage 688-0423 Julie Batz
724-2701 Lynn Dreeszen 439-8632
Tim Ryan
476-6550
Our website:
http://www.scprostate.org Doug Thornton 724-6446
(Webmaster)
SUPPORT
SUB-GROUP FOR MEN WITH ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER MEETINGS
This group is for men
that have been diagnosed with prostate cancer which has spread outside the
prostate or who have experienced a recurrence after primary treatment.
Typically, these men are receiving hormone blockade, are participating in a
clinical trial or are receiving some other form of advanced treatment. The
sub-Group meets every TWO months at the Katz Cancer Resource Center of
Dominican Hospital. The sub-group meets on the 2nd MONDAY OF THE MONTH.
Next meeting……… August 14th, 5 - 7pm
The
purpose of this group is to better address the special problems and issues of
men with advanced prostate cancer. In addition, at some meetings, we invite
local medical oncologists to discuss their approach and treatments. Men with
advanced prostate cancer will continue to be welcomed at the regular monthly
meetings on the last Tuesday of the month. Tony Calvo has agreed to coordinate
the sub-group. If you have any suggestions or questions, contact Tony Calvo at
684-0940.
SUPPORT SUB-GROUP MEETING FOR WIVES and PARTNERS OF MEN LIVING WITH PROSTATE
CANCER
This group is for women
to share information with each other, learn more about prostate cancer, and how
to cope with the impact of the disease individually and within the family in a
supportive, caring and confidential environment. The meeting will be held every
two months, the 2nd Monday of the month, 5 – 7pm (same time and same building as
the men’s Advanced Prostate Cancer Meeting). For more information, contact Julie
Batz at 724-2701. Next meeting……… August 14th, 5 - 7pm, upstairs in Room E
We Need Your Help…….
The American
Cancer Society Relay For Life® is an event that raises awareness,
celebrates survivors, remembers those lost to the disease, and raises funds to
fight cancer through research, education, advocacy and patient services.
Be part of
the American Cancer Society Relay For Life!
Together, we’ll honor the
courageous spirit of people who have been touched by cancer. Our support
group will be having a table at this great event and we’d really appreciate if
you can spend a couple of hours helping out. Please call anyone on the
steering committee if you can help and we’d love to see you there.
Relay For Life of Santa Cruz
July 15 - 16, 2006 Cabrillo College, Aptos, CA
Relay For Life of Watsonville
August 12 - 13, 2006 Santa Cruz
County Fairgrounds
….PROSTATE CANCER IN THE NEWS..…
Women
Can Help Men Talk To Doctors About Prostate Cancer
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Skip the shirt and
tie this Father's Day -- show Dad you really care by urging him to talk to his
doctor about prostate cancer. Most men will listen, hints a survey released
today.
"Women don't realize how much influence they
have with their husbands on matters of health," said Leslie D. Michelson, head
of the Prostate Cancer Foundation. "Daughters, wives and partners may be our
secret weapons to get men to talk with their doctors about prostate cancer."
Prostate cancer is the most common non-skin
cancer in the U.S., striking one in six American men. This year alone, an
estimated 234,000 men will be diagnosed with the disease and 27,000 will die
from it.
The Prostate Cancer Foundation/Gillette Men's
Health Survey, which involved 1,572 healthy men and women ages 25 to 62 years,
shows, not surprisingly, that men are reluctant to talk with their doctors about
prostate cancer. Among men with a family history of the disease, about one in
four has never discussed his family history or his personal risk with a doctor.
Of men older than 50 -- the age of highest risk -- nearly one in five has never
discussed his family history or personal risk for prostate cancer with a doctor.
While 73 percent of men surveyed said they are
concerned about prostate cancer, many are misinformed about the disease -- even
those at increased risk for developing prostate cancer. Most notably, 30 percent
of men over age 50 said they would wait for symptoms to develop before seeing a
doctor, when, in fact, most men who develop prostate cancer never experience any
symptoms in the early stages of the disease, when more treatment options are
available.
Nearly three quarters of the men and women
surveyed mistakenly believed that prostate cancer is less common among men than
breast cancer is among women. In reality, men are 33 percent more likely to
develop prostate cancer than women are to develop breast cancer.
But perhaps the most important "take home"
message of the survey, the authors say, is the important role that wives and
daughters can play in raising men's awareness of prostate cancer, and other
major threats to their health, and getting them to talk to their doctor.
Almost three quarters of men surveyed said they
would be very likely to talk to their doctor about prostate cancer if urged do
to so by the women in their lives. Yet, only half of the women, according to the
survey, believe they have this kind of influence over their man.
Source: http://today.reuters.com
Micrometastatic Disease After
Surgery & Radiation
by
Charles Myers M.D
(This is part of an article from the Prostate
Forum (May 2006) a subscription newsletter by Dr. Charles Myers)
For many years now, we've known that women with
breast cancer can develop metastatic disease
twenty or more years after the cancerous breast has been removed. This
phenomenon also occurs in melanoma patients. In both cancers, even before
diagnosis occurs, it appears that cancer cells can spread throughout the body
and then stay dormant for many years before they begin to
regrow.
Recently, several lines of evidence suggest that
the same process may happen in prostate cancer. For example, Dr. Patrick
Walsh at Johns
Hopkins recenty reported that only
64% of his patients were disease-free fifteen years after radical
prostatectomy and that ten percent of
relapses occurred between the tenth and fifteenth year. This is important
because Dr. Walsh has long made it a practice to only operate on those likely to
benefit from surgery. He is also widely recognized as one of the best surgeons
of his generation. In a separate study, Swanson
et al.
reported a steady stream of cancer relapses out to 22.5 years. In fact, about
half the relapses occurred after the tenth post-surgical year. Both
studies illustrate that prostate cancer can remain dormant for more than a
decade after surgery before evolving into metastatic cancer.
So what's going on here? Special research
techniques allow investigators to detect one cancer cell in the midst of 10
million normal cells. These techniques show that many newly diagnosed patients
have cancer cells circulating in their
blood stream and even lodged in their bone
marrow. It is my best guess that a portion of these cells probably survive in a
dormant state only to reemerge as
metastatic disease years after an apparently
successful radical prostatectomy. Obviously,
this doesn't happen to everyone, but at present we have no way of knowing who
will recur and who won't. For this reason, I think it is prudent to think about
your cancer as a life-time problem like diabetes, hypertension or high
cholesterol rather than something you treat once and can then stop thinking
about. Your cancer will always be with you. The key is to constantly be on the
outlook for recurrent cancer and to take reasonable steps to reduce the risk of
recurrence.
Preventing Relapse
- In the past several issues of Prostate Forum, we've reviewed the
potential role of diet and supplements in preventing prostate cancer
progression. (See issues Vol 9 #3 and
Vol 9 #4, available at www.prostateforum.com/backissues.htm.)
But there are also several prescription drugs
that may reduce your risk of recurrence. The evidence to support these drugs
varies considerably and in no case do we have large-scale randomized controlled
trials proving their benefit. In addition to those listed … there are other
drugs that show promise, but have not been so fully evaluated. (These drugs are
listed in Dr. Myers newsletter)
As we've discussed before in this newsletter,
there are two major male sex hormones: testosterone
and dihydrotestosterone.
Dihydrotestosterone, or DHT, is formed from
testosterone and is typically present at 10% of the concentration of
testosterone. Dihydrotestosterone appears to have a relatively limited role in
adult males but it does exacerbate male-pattern baldness
and stimulates prostate growth. Proscar was
the first drug developed that blocks the conversion of testosterone to
dihydrotestosterone and it has received PDA
approval for the treatment of male-pattern baldness as well as
benign
prostatic hypertrophy, a disease
involved in increasing prostate size with age. Because
Proscar prevents conversion of
testosterone to
dihydrotestosterone, the drug not only decreases
dihydrotestosterone, but also causes an
increase in serum testosterone levels. Within prostate tissue, these changes can
be quite dramatic, with the dihydrotestosterone
declining by 90% and the testosterone level increasing ten fold.
Proscar has a number of interesting effects in
patients. First, it dramatically decreases blood flow to prostate tissue. This
has led Proscar to become the standard treatment in men bleeding from their
prostate gland, which in turn has led to the suggestion that
dihydrotestosterone, not testosterone,
controls prostate blood flow.
In between 15-20% of men, Proscar suppresses
libido even though it markedly increases serum testosterone levels. While this
side effect is reversible, it suggests a possible difference among men in the
role of dihydrotestosterone in maintaining sex drive.
In a recent, large randomized controlled trial,
Proscar caused nearly a 25% reduction in the risk of prostate cancer. And in
another randomized controlled trial, the risk of recurrent cancer following
radical prostatectomy was significantly
reduced by 10 mg per day
of Proscar. This single study provides
evidence to support using Proscar to reduce
the risk of recurrent prostate cancer. Since the one major side effect of this
drug—loss of sex drive—is reversible, using Proscar appears to be
extraordinarily safe.
There are two pathways leading from
testosterone to
dihydrotestosterone and Proscar blocks only one of these.
Avodart is a second-generation drug designed
to replace Proscar and it has the added advantage of blocking both paths from
testosterone to dihydrotestosterone. By
every indicator I can find, Avodart is a better drug at blocking
dihydrotestosterone and this hormone's biologic effects.
The study of
Avodart's impact on prostate cancer
is in its early phase. At present, I can think of only one clinical study that
sheds light on this issue. A large randomized controlled trial testing Avodart
as a treatment for benign prostatic
hypertrophy has been in progress for a number of years. In the control arm, the
cumulative incidence of prostate cancer has increased steadily from year to
year, as one might expect. In the patients on Avodart, the number of new cases
of prostate cancer has fallen off fairly dramatically and is, at present, 50% of
the control group.
I think
this makes a reasonable case for using either Proscar or Avodart to delay or
prevent relapse following a radical prostatectomy. Nevertheless, a large-scale
randomized controlled trial would be an ideal way of testing its use.
If you are
interested in subscribing
to Dr. Myers monthly PROSTATE FORUM
newsletter call: 800-305-2432 or visit:
www.prostateforum.com
Research Finds Lesser Rectal Cancer Risks
Associated with Prostatic Irradiation
03 Jul 2006
-
According to a new study published in the
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, no appreciable risks were found to
be associated with prostratic irradiation and the development of rectal cancer.
Wayne S. Kendal, M.D., Ph.D., an Associate
Professor in Radiation Oncology at the Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre in
Ontario said this study has uncovered the real facts and helped people choosing
radiation therapy as one of the treatments available for prostrate cancer.
Men received radiation therapy for prostate
cancer are not at any appreciable increased risk of developing rectal cancer
compared to those not given radiation therapy, according to a new study
published in the July 1, 2006, issue of the International Journal of Radiation
Oncology*Biology*Physics, the official journal of ASTRO, the American Society
for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
This year, 235,000 American men will be
diagnosed with prostate cancer. The main ways of dealing with the disease are
radiation therapy, surgery and watchful waiting - each of which has its benefits
and disadvantages. Researchers have hypothesized that one disadvantage of using
radiation to kill the cancer cells in the prostate is that it might also make
men more likely to develop cancer in the nearby rectum.
In this study, doctors in Canada evaluated the
records of 237,773 men who had prostate cancer. Of them, 33,841 received
radiation therapy, 167,607 had their prostate removed surgically and 36,335
received neither treatment. On an initial simple evaluation, doctors found that
rectal cancer developed in 243 men who received radiation (0.7 percent), 578 men
treated with surgery (0.3 percent), and 227 of the men given neither treatment
(0.8 percent). Once doctors had adjusted for the age differences between all the
men in the irradiated and non-irradiated groups, they could not find any
significant increased risk of rectal cancer in the irradiated men compared to
those not given radiation therapy.
Rectal cancer from other causes is frequent
enough in our population to obscure any small incidence of radiation-induced
cancer. I hope that the results of this study will help men with prostate cancer
and their families put these risks in their proper perspective, and not let
their concerns about rectal cancer dissuade them from choosing radiation therapy
as a treatment for this disease, said Wayne S. Kendal, M.D., Ph.D., an Associate
Professor in Radiation Oncology at the Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre in
Ontario, Canada.
Source: Eurekalert
http://www.medindia.net/news/view_news_main.asp?x=11974
******************************
Fair
Use Notice: This
newsletter may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically
authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit,
educational use constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law). If you wish to use any copyrighted
material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain
permission from the copyright owner.
+++++
The Santa
Cruz County Prostate Cancer Support Group does not endorse any provider,
organization, product or individual. All medical decisions should be made
with the advice and consultation of medical professionals.
Our
newsletter serves over 250
members. Many THANKS to the American Cancer Society for assisting with the
printing and mailing of this newsletter and the Katz Cancer Resource Center for
allowing us to use their facility.
|